On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:09:24PM -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote: > >I just ran it against 2.63 and 3.0-rcX. 6 sec first time, 1 sec next. > > > >There are so many network-related options you can fiddle with in SA, one of > >them must be causing the difference. > > > >However, the fact that an e-mail can take 70+ sec to parse should make you > >re-look at what options you have enabled. > > > > I upgraded around 15 boxes the other night (a mix of Slackware, RedHat > ent3 and FreeBSD machines) and they all had the same problem with the > timeouts.
Yes... but what are your settings? I'm not saying that out of the box SA doesn't do this - it's just that I wouldn't run it out of the box (I don't run anything out of the box ;-). Tell you what - this is a SA issue. If you think this is taking too long (of course you do), bring it up on the SA mailing-list - maybe with a URL to the email for others to check out. 70+ secs should never be happening. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
