On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:39:22PM +0200, Maurice Snellen wrote: > Why not do it the other way around and allow for tests to be excluded > based on environment variables set and just let it scan everything by > default.
I just can't win :-) Orginally SA was called for ALL mail - then people started complaining about "why is it scanning our local mail?". So I change it - now other people want it the other way again! :-) No - I think this is the best solution. I *love* SpamAssassin, but it can cause quite a few false positives. By stopping SA from scanning your locally generated mail, you remove 99% of the false positives that matter (i.e. the ones that have users screaming at you...). -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
