I would like to add, that c) I rather trust opensource and therefore public code to correctly unpack the email then a closed program with for me at least no knowledge of the internals.
Jean-Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:13 AM Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Possible optimization using sophos ? > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:06:55AM -0700, Renato wrote: > > Could I just bypass deconstruct_msg and call sweep/sophie directly ? Am i > > missing something ? > > Its written the way it is for the case of: > > a> a scanner that doesn't do things as well as sweep > b> running more than one scanner. Unpacking first is better than each > scanner unpacking itself > > I can't think of a clean way of generalising the problem you have. Of course > you are welcome to hack the code to get the performance benefit, but I can't > think of a way of doing it generally. > > -- > Cheers > > Jason Haar > > Information Security Manager > Trimble Navigation Ltd. > Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Qmail-scanner-general mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general > _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
