Hi Paolo, Yes, the plugin is not approved yet, and it shouldn't be possible to download it either from the website or QGIS as a normal user. However, the plugin could be downloaded by a reviewer or someone with permission and triggered the counter. But I guess it's part of the workflow.
Best regards, Lova Andriarimalala *QGIS Full Stack Developer * *T *: +27(0) 87 809 2702 *E *: l...@kartoza.com *W* : kartoza.com *This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you * *have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying* *of the contents is prohibited.* On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:48, Paolo Tormene < paolo.torm...@globalquakemodel.org> wrote: > Hi again. I see verson 3.24.0 is now correctly marked as experimental but > not yet approved, although unexpectedly there is 1 download for it, so > perhaps there is still something wrong with it. > Please, may you check? > Thanks again, > Paolo > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 5:09 PM Paolo Tormene < > paolo.torm...@globalquakemodel.org> wrote: > >> Thank you very much! >> I've just re-uploaded version 3.24.0 (experimental) and the interface >> shows correctly the flask icon, so the issue was in fact fixed. >> Best regards, >> Paolo >> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 8:38 AM Lova Andriarimalala <l...@kartoza.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Dear Paolo, >>> >>> Thank you very much for reporting this. >>> >>> The experimental checkbox in the upload and new version form has been >>> removed, as discussed in the issue at >>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Plugins-Website/issues/71. However, it >>> appeared that the new version form was not handling the experimental >>> attribute correctly. A new fix has been submitted to address this issue: >>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Plugins-Website/pull/99. >>> >>> Uploading a new version as experimental should now work correctly using >>> the same workflow. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Lova Andriarimalala >>> >>> >>> *QGIS Full Stack Developer * >>> *T *: +27(0) 87 809 2702 *E *: l...@kartoza.com *W* : >>> kartoza.com >>> >>> >>> >>> *This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for >>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you * >>> *have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately >>> and delete it from your system. Unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying* >>> *of the contents is prohibited.* >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 16:06, Paolo Tormene via QGIS-Developer < >>> qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: >>> >>>> P.S.: I see version 3.24.0 has now been approved, without the >>>> experimental flag. I have to delete it, before any user accidentally >>>> downloads it believing it is "stable". >>>> Please let me know how to proceed in order to re-upload the same >>>> version as experimental. >>>> Thanks again, >>>> Paolo >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM Paolo Tormene < >>>> paolo.torm...@globalquakemodel.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello. I have a question about the management of the "experimental" >>>>> flag in a newly uploaded plugin version. In metadata.txt in this case I >>>>> have experimental=True. However, in >>>>> https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/svir/#plugin-versions in the row >>>>> corresponding to the new version 3.24.0 I don't see the expected symbol of >>>>> the flask. I noticed that, with respect to the past, in the form used to >>>>> upload a new plugin version now there is no checkbox to specify if the >>>>> version is experimental or not. I supposed it would have been extracted >>>>> from the metadata, but it looks like that flag was ignored. >>>>> Please, may you check about this and possibly suggest to me how to >>>>> proceed in case the uploading workflow has changed? >>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>> Paolo >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882 >>>>> >>>>> *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk >>>>> >>>>> *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -* >>>>> @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld >>>>> <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882 >>>> >>>> *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk >>>> >>>> *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -* >>>> @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882 >> >> *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk >> >> *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -* >> @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld >> <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld> >> > > > -- > > *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882 > > *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk > > *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -* > @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld > <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld> >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
