P.S.: I see version 3.24.0 has now been approved, without the experimental flag. I have to delete it, before any user accidentally downloads it believing it is "stable". Please let me know how to proceed in order to re-upload the same version as experimental. Thanks again, Paolo
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM Paolo Tormene < paolo.torm...@globalquakemodel.org> wrote: > Hello. I have a question about the management of the "experimental" flag > in a newly uploaded plugin version. In metadata.txt in this case I have > experimental=True. However, in > https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/svir/#plugin-versions in the row > corresponding to the new version 3.24.0 I don't see the expected symbol of > the flask. I noticed that, with respect to the past, in the form used to > upload a new plugin version now there is no checkbox to specify if the > version is experimental or not. I supposed it would have been extracted > from the metadata, but it looks like that flag was ignored. > Please, may you check about this and possibly suggest to me how to proceed > in case the uploading workflow has changed? > Thanks in advance, > Paolo > > -- > > *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882 > > *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk > > *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -* > @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld > <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld> > -- *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882 *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -* @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld>
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
