On 17-10-23, 10:14, Hanna Czenczek wrote: > On 17.10.23 09:53, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 17-10-23, 09:51, Hanna Czenczek wrote: > > > Not that I’m really opposed to that, but I don’t see the problem with just > > > doing that in the same work that makes qemu actually use this flag, > > > exactly > > > because it’s just a -1/+1 change.
I should have replied here :) > > > > > > I can send a v2, but should I do the same for libvhost-user and define the > > > flag there? Do I have to add a patch to do the same for F_STATUS, which > > > so > > > far only got a placeholder comment? > > Sure, that's fine too. > > I would rather not, though, and don’t see a tangible benefit in doing so. Sorry for the miscommunication, I meant we can leave it as is for now and let it be handled by the commit that uses it. -- viresh
