On 17-10-23, 09:51, Hanna Czenczek wrote: > Not that I’m really opposed to that, but I don’t see the problem with just > doing that in the same work that makes qemu actually use this flag, exactly > because it’s just a -1/+1 change. > > I can send a v2, but should I do the same for libvhost-user and define the > flag there? Do I have to add a patch to do the same for F_STATUS, which so > far only got a placeholder comment?
Sure, that's fine too. -- viresh
