> From: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 1:27 PM
> To: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-
> a...@nongnu.org
> Cc: m...@kernel.org; jean-phili...@linaro.org; Jonathan Cameron
> <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>; lpieral...@kernel.org;
> peter.mayd...@linaro.org; richard.hender...@linaro.org;
> imamm...@redhat.com; andrew.jo...@linux.dev; phi...@linaro.org;
> eric.au...@redhat.com; oliver.up...@linux.dev; pbonz...@redhat.com;
> m...@redhat.com; w...@kernel.org; gs...@redhat.com; raf...@kernel.org;
> alex.ben...@linaro.org; li...@armlinux.org.uk;
> dar...@os.amperecomputing.com; il...@os.amperecomputing.com;
> vis...@os.amperecomputing.com; karl.heub...@oracle.com;
> miguel.l...@oracle.com; salil.me...@opnsrc.net; zhukeqian
> <zhukeqi...@huawei.com>; wangxiongfeng (C) <wangxiongfe...@huawei.com>;
> wangyanan (Y) <wangyana...@huawei.com>; jiakern...@gmail.com;
> maob...@loongson.cn; lixiang...@loongson.cn; Linuxarm <linux...@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/10] hw/acpi: Init GED framework with cpu hotplug
> events
>
> On 09.10.23 13:28, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > ACPI GED(as described in the ACPI 6.2 spec) can be used to generate ACPI
> events
> > when OSPM/guest receives an interrupt listed in the _CRS object of GED.
> OSPM
> > then maps or demultiplexes the event by evaluating _EVT method.
> >
> > This change adds the support of cpu hotplug event initialization in the
> > existing GED framework.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqi...@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqi...@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gs...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c | 8 ++++++++
> > include/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c
> b/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c
> > index a3d31631fe..d2fa1d0e4a 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static const uint32_t ged_supported_events[] = {
> > ACPI_GED_MEM_HOTPLUG_EVT,
> > ACPI_GED_PWR_DOWN_EVT,
> > ACPI_GED_NVDIMM_HOTPLUG_EVT,
> > + ACPI_GED_CPU_HOTPLUG_EVT,
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -400,6 +401,13 @@ static void acpi_ged_initfn(Object *obj)
> > memory_region_init_io(&ged_st->regs, obj, &ged_regs_ops, ged_st,
> > TYPE_ACPI_GED "-regs", ACPI_GED_REG_COUNT);
> > sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &ged_st->regs);
> > +
> > + s->cpuhp.device = OBJECT(s);
> > + memory_region_init(&s->container_cpuhp, OBJECT(dev), "cpuhp
> container",
> > + ACPI_CPU_HOTPLUG_REG_LEN);
> > + sysbus_init_mmio(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &s->container_cpuhp);
> > + cpu_hotplug_hw_init(&s->container_cpuhp, OBJECT(dev),
> > + &s->cpuhp_state, 0);
> > }
> >
> > static void acpi_ged_class_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h
> b/include/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h
> > index d831bbd889..d0a5a43abf 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/generic_event_device.h
> > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> > #define HW_ACPI_GENERIC_EVENT_DEVICE_H
> >
> > #include "hw/sysbus.h"
> > +#include "hw/acpi/cpu_hotplug.h"
> > #include "hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h"
> > #include "hw/acpi/ghes.h"
> > #include "qom/object.h"
> > @@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(AcpiGedState, ACPI_GED)
> > #define ACPI_GED_MEM_HOTPLUG_EVT 0x1
> > #define ACPI_GED_PWR_DOWN_EVT 0x2
> > #define ACPI_GED_NVDIMM_HOTPLUG_EVT 0x4
> > +#define ACPI_GED_CPU_HOTPLUG_EVT 0x8
> >
> > typedef struct GEDState {
> > MemoryRegion evt;
> > @@ -108,6 +110,9 @@ struct AcpiGedState {
> > SysBusDevice parent_obj;
> > MemHotplugState memhp_state;
> > MemoryRegion container_memhp;
> > + CPUHotplugState cpuhp_state;
> > + MemoryRegion container_cpuhp;
> > + AcpiCpuHotplug cpuhp;
>
> Am I wrong or is that member completely unused/uninitialized?
No it is not. Please check below change in acpi_ged_initfn()
+ s->cpuhp.device = OBJECT(s);
Thanks
Salil.
