On 17 February 2012 13:03, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 17.02.2012 10:59, schrieb andrzej zaborowski: >> On 3 February 2012 03:59, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>> No other emulated CPU uses this at this time. >> >> But why does this code better fit in hw/ than target-arm? The iwMMXt >> registers are core registers after all. > > It seems you've misread something here. This is all in target-arm. :)
Yes, I did, sorry. I had looked at the whole series previously, forgotten it, then looked at this patch that was still in my inbox without any of the context. ... > The final plan for rnpn is to have two QOM properties and to request a > "pxa270" CPU, then set the revision since there are no functional > dependencies on the revision at all. (cc'ing Paul) > I've actually compile-tested and grep'ed this. > Sounds reasonable. > > Please note also the following v4 that came out of an IRC discussion: > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/commitdiff/1262acf06308cf2bde46520d0238548cb73c79fe > If you need the JTAG_ID somewhere please let us know soon. No, it's not used anywhere (obviously otherwise it wouldn't be a comment) Cheers
