Considering the case of FEAT_7_1_EAX being 0 and FEAT_7_1_EDX being
non-zero. Such as starting a VM on GraniteRapids using '-cpu host',
we can see two leafs CPUID_7_0 and CPUID_7_1 in VM, because both
CPUID_7_1_EAX and CPUID_7_1_EDX have non-zero value, but if minus all
FEAT_7_1_EAX features using
'-cpu host,-avx-vnni,-avx512-bf16,-fzrm,-fsrs,-fsrc,-amx-fp16', we can't
get CPUID_7_1 leaf even though CPUID_7_1_EDX has non-zero value.
So it is necessary to update cpuid_level_func7 by CPUID_7_1_EDX, otherwise
guest may report wrong maximum number sub-leaves in leaf 07H.
Fixes: eaaa197d5b11 ("target/i386: Add support for AVX-VNNI-INT8 in CPUID
enumeration")
Signed-off-by: Tao Su <tao1...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao...@intel.com>
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index b5688cabb4..952744af97 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -6880,6 +6880,7 @@ void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_6_EAX);
x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_0_ECX);
x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_1_EAX);
+ x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_1_EDX);
x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0001_EDX);
x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0001_ECX);
x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0007_EDX);
--
2.34.1
