On 7 February 2012 22:07, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 07.02.2012 20:06, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 7 February 2012 18:41, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>> Andrzej will have had his reasons to put it in the code. This series >>> just moves code around so I don't want to remove it without his ack. >> >> That was my point -- as far as I can see this patch *is* adding code >> and a struct field that wasn't there before. > > Huh? Look closely, it *was* a comment in the original code.
Exactly. It was a comment; now it's code. I don't think we should be adding code. > And I don't want to *move* that comment over into my new code. You can move the comment, or you can just drop it; I'm happy with either. I don't want new code/struct fields we don't use. -- PMM
