On 7 February 2012 18:41, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 07.02.2012 18:47, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 3 February 2012 02:59, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>> + uint64_t jtag_id; >> >> If we're not using this anywhere we should just not have it. > > Andrzej will have had his reasons to put it in the code. This series > just moves code around so I don't want to remove it without his ack.
That was my point -- as far as I can see this patch *is* adding code and a struct field that wasn't there before. -- PMM
