On 5/10/23 00:00, Weiwei Li wrote:
Zc* extensions (version 1.0) are ratified.
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqi...@iscas.ac.cn>
---
target/riscv/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index db0875fb43..99ed9cb80e 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1571,6 +1571,14 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zmmul", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zmmul, false),
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zca", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zca, false),
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcb, false),
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcd", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcd, false),
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zce", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zce, false),
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcf", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcf, false),
I see that zcf has a different ordering in isa_edata_arr[]. Is this intended?
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zca, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zca),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zcb, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zcb),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zcf, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zcf),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zcd, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zcd),
ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(zce, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_zce),
Not related to this patch per se. Just wondered if there's some reason for the
different ordering between these arrays.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmp, false),
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmt, false),
+
/* Vendor-specific custom extensions */
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadba, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadbb, false),
@@ -1588,14 +1596,6 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
/* These are experimental so mark with 'x-' */
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zicond", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zicond, false),
- DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zca", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zca, false),
- DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zcb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcb, false),
- DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zcd", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcd, false),
- DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zce", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zce, false),
- DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zcf", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcf, false),
- DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zcmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmp, false),
- DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zcmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmt, false),
-
/* ePMP 0.9.3 */
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-epmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.epmp, false),
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-smaia", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_smaia, false),
