On Tue, Apr 25, 2023, 12:45 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:02:39PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > > NetBSD cannot successfully run "ensurepip" without access to the pyexpat > > module, which NetBSD debundles. Like the Debian patch, it would be > > strictly faster long term to install pip/setuptools, and I recommend > > developers at their workstations take that approach instead. > > This sounds a bit like a NetBSD packaging bug surely ? If we've got > ensurepip installed and it doesn't work due to missing expat I would > have though NetBSD should add a dependancy. > Yes, I agree - though I think NetBSD doesn't unbundle ensurepip, so there might be nothing to add a dependency against ... and I assume they split out pyexpat for a reason. I can report it, anyway. It should at least fail more gracefully than it does. > None the less, we'll need a fix in QEMU until that's addressed. > > > > > For the purposes of a throwaway VM, there's not really a speed > > difference for who is responsible for installing pip; us (needs > > py310-pip) or Python (needs py310-expat). > > > > Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > > --- > > tests/vm/netbsd | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> > > With regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- > https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- > https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- > https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| > >
