Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> writes: > Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >> (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again) >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Juan, >>> >>> Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space I'd >>> like to take some time to discuss the future direction of icount. > > For next week we have: > - more single binary qemu (philippe?) > - TDX migration from intel. > We asked them on the previous call to change their design to transfer > stuff through migration channels and not create a new channel. But I > haven't heard from intel. (wei?) > They agreed to send the slides and post the code before continue > discussion. > > And now I like the title of you topic > > - Future Direction of icount > > O:-) > > So, I will recommend 20 minutes each if Wei shows up, or 30/30 for the > rest. > > What do the rest of the people think.
I think we either need fewer topics per call (ideally one), or strictly enforced time limits per topic. I don't fancy meetings where the topic that made me attend falls off the end. The former may necessitate more frequent calls.
