Re: [Patch 09/14] target/riscv: Replace check for F/D to Zve32f/Zve64d in trans_rvv.c.inc

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

On 2/14/23 05:38, Weiwei Li wrote:

Check for Zve32f/Zve64d can overlap check for F/D

Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqi...@iscas.ac.cn>
---

Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>

  target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc 
b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
index 6f7ecf1a68..9b2711b94b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvv.c.inc
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ static bool require_rvf(DisasContext *s)
      switch (s->sew) {
      case MO_16:
      case MO_32:
-        return has_ext(s, RVF);
+        return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve32f;
      case MO_64:
-        return has_ext(s, RVD);
+        return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve64d;
      default:
          return false;
      }
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ static bool require_scale_rvf(DisasContext *s)
      switch (s->sew) {
      case MO_8:
      case MO_16:
-        return has_ext(s, RVF);
+        return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve32f;
      case MO_32:
-        return has_ext(s, RVD);
+        return s->cfg_ptr->ext_zve64d;
      default:
          return false;
      }