On 02/02/2023 00:51, Richard Henderson wrote:
Lots of missing trap code for cpu_loop().r~ Richard Henderson (14): linux-user/sparc: Raise SIGILL for all unhandled software traps linux-user/sparc: Tidy syscall trap linux-user/sparc: Use TT_TRAP for flush windows linux-user/sparc: Tidy window spill/fill traps linux-user/sparc: Fix sparc64_{get,set}_context traps linux-user/sparc: Handle software breakpoint trap linux-user/sparc: Handle division by zero traps linux-user/sparc: Handle getcc, setcc, getpsr traps linux-user/sparc: Handle priviledged opcode trap linux-user/sparc: Handle privilidged action trap
Minor spelling nit: s/priviledged/privileged/
linux-user/sparc: Handle coprocessor disabled trap linux-user/sparc: Handle unimplemented flush trap linux-user/sparc: Handle floating-point exceptions linux-user/sparc: Handle tag overflow traps linux-user/sparc/target_signal.h | 2 +- linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 5 + target/sparc/cpu.h | 3 +- linux-user/sparc/cpu_loop.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ linux-user/sparc/signal.c | 36 +++---- 5 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
Alas I'm not overly familiar with the Linux syscall implementation on SPARC (all I can really do is run a chroot debian ports install for testing), however if all your local tests pass then I'm happy for this to go via the tcg or linux-user trees.
ATB, Mark.
