On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:15:45 -0500
Gregory Price <gregory.pr...@memverge.com> wrote:
> Found a bug, not sure how we missed this, probably happed with rebasing
> and some fixups. We're presently reporting the volatile region as
> non-volatile, 1 line patch.
>
> Jonathan do you want a separate patch shipped or would you rather just
> apply a fixup to the commit in your current branch?
I'll fix up as I'd only squash the patch in anyway.
If tomorrow is slightly less crazy busy than today I'll push out a new
tree with this and the pass through decoders support RFC
(I'll post that to the lists as well)
Jonathan
>
> diff --git a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> index 919cdf141e..1c5168e2e4 100644
> --- a/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> +++ b/hw/mem/cxl_type3.c
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int ct3_build_cdat_table(CDATSubHeader
> ***cdat_table, void *priv)
> /* Now fill them in */
> if (volatile_mr) {
> rc = ct3_build_cdat_entries_for_mr(table, dsmad_handle++,
> volatile_mr,
> - true, 0);
> + false, 0);
> if (rc < 0) {
> return rc;
> }
