On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 02:47:24PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > I'd prefer to not go down that path for now. QEMU_VM_SECTION_START without > QEMU_VM_SECTION_PART and QEMU_VM_SECTION_END feels pretty incomplete and > wrong to me.
That's fine. > > If we want to do that in the future, we should conditionally send > QEMU_VM_SECTION_START only if we have se->ops I assume? Yes. START/FULL frames are mostly replaceable afaiu in the stream ABI, so we always have space to change no matter what. Let's leave that as-is. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
