On 8/17/22 04:10, WANG Xuerui wrote:
From my own experiences, different use cases care about different aspects of the CPU, and
that IMO is an argument in favor of providing both (high-fidelity models named after
actual product model names, and virtual models named after ISA levels). But before we have
truly high-fidelity models I think we should start with the virtual ones first. And don't
pretend the currently implemented model is LA464 -- the kernel change I've linked to [1]
implies the opposite.
No, it simply pointed to a bug in qemu that could have been fixed.
The trouble with inventing virtual models is that no one knows what they mean. Targeting
real hardware is better, because we have a documented standard.
r~
