On 15 December 2011 10:19, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> I think this was related to qemu_malloc() and Anthony's sed run made it >> refer to g_malloc(), even though it works just fine with 0 bytes. We >> should probably remove this sentence. > > If you remove it then you can't interpret it the way I did. It's not > longer possible to say that g_malloc() never returns NULL. You always > have to qualify that with "unless you ask for 0 bytes". :)
Well, we should reword it, then, because the thing it was warning about is no longer true... -- PMM
