Am 15.12.2011 10:36, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 04:28:28PM +0800, 陳韋任 wrote: >> I found this in HACKING: >> >> Please note that NULL check for the g_malloc result is redundant and >> that g_malloc() call with zero size is not allowed. > > So we have: > > 1. You should not request 0 bytes from g_malloc().
I think this was related to qemu_malloc() and Anthony's sed run made it refer to g_malloc(), even though it works just fine with 0 bytes. We should probably remove this sentence. Kevin
