Add a test to check for overflow conditions in s390x.
This patch is based on the following patches :
* https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=5a2e67a691501
* https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc6e0d0f2db51
Signed-off-by: Gautam Agrawal <gautamnagra...@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Corrected the "long" data type to "long long"
- Changed local variable name in overflow function to "res"
tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target | 1 +
tests/tcg/s390x/overflow.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/overflow.c
diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
index 3124172736..7f86de85b9 100644
--- a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
+++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ TESTS+=shift
TESTS+=trap
TESTS+=signals-s390x
TESTS+=branch-relative-long
+TESTS+=overflow
VECTOR_TESTS=vxeh2_vs
VECTOR_TESTS+=vxeh2_vcvt
diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/overflow.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/overflow.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1c59c2cb70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/overflow.c
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+int overflow_add_32(int x, int y)
+{
+ int res;
+ return __builtin_add_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int overflow_add_64(long long x, long long y)
+{
+ long long res;
+ return __builtin_add_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int overflow_sub_32(int x, int y)
+{
+ int res;
+ return __builtin_sub_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int overflow_sub_64(long long x, long long y)
+{
+ long long res;
+ return __builtin_sub_overflow(x, y, &res);
+}
+
+int a1_add = -2147483648;
+int b1_add = -2147483648;
+long long a2_add = -9223372036854775808ULL;
+long long b2_add = -9223372036854775808ULL;
+
+int a1_sub;
+int b1_sub = -2147483648;
+long long a2_sub = 0L;
+long long b2_sub = -9223372036854775808ULL;
+
+int main()
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (!overflow_add_32(a1_add, b1_add)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while adding 32 bits\n");
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ if (!overflow_add_64(a2_add, b2_add)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while adding 64 bits\n");
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ if (!overflow_sub_32(a1_sub, b1_sub)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while subtracting 32 bits\n");
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ if (!overflow_sub_64(a2_sub, b2_sub)) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "data overflow while subtracting 64 bits\n");
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
--
2.34.1
