On 4/25/22 00:01, Paul Brook wrote:
+#define SHUFFLE4(F, a, b, offset) do { \
+ r0 = a->F((order & 3) + offset); \
+ r1 = a->F(((order >> 2) & 3) + offset); \
+ r2 = b->F(((order >> 4) & 3) + offset); \
+ r3 = b->F(((order >> 6) & 3) + offset); \
+ d->F(offset) = r0; \
+ d->F(offset + 1) = r1; \
+ d->F(offset + 2) = r2; \
+ d->F(offset + 3) = r3; \
+ } while (0)
+
#if SHIFT == 0
void glue(helper_pshufw, SUFFIX)(Reg *d, Reg *s, int order)
{
- Reg r;
+ uint16_t r0, r1, r2, r3;
- r.W(0) = s->W(order & 3);
- r.W(1) = s->W((order >> 2) & 3);
- r.W(2) = s->W((order >> 4) & 3);
- r.W(3) = s->W((order >> 6) & 3);
- MOVE(*d, r);
+ SHUFFLE4(W, s, s, 0);
I am not particularly attached to the MOVE macro, but replacing the Reg
variable with scalars seems worse.
Paolo
