On 11/23/2011 04:26 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
According to Intel's Open Source Software Developer Manual,
the dump counters address must be Dword aligned.

The new code enforces this alignment, so s->statsaddr may now
be used with stw_le_pci_dma() and stl_le_pci_dma().

Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil<s...@weilnetz.de>

Anthiny, coul you apply pls?

Yup.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


---
  hw/eepro100.c |   10 +++++++++-
  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/eepro100.c b/hw/eepro100.c
index 7d59e71..29ec5b4 100644
--- a/hw/eepro100.c
+++ b/hw/eepro100.c
@@ -976,7 +976,15 @@ static void eepro100_cu_command(EEPRO100State * s, uint8_t 
val)
      case CU_STATSADDR:
          /* Load dump counters address. */
          s->statsaddr = e100_read_reg4(s, SCBPointer);
-        TRACE(OTHER, logout("val=0x%02x (status address)\n", val));
+        TRACE(OTHER, logout("val=0x%02x (dump counters address)\n", val));
+        if (s->statsaddr&  3) {
+            /* Memory must be Dword aligned. */
+            logout("unaligned dump counters address\n");
+            /* Handling of misaligned addresses is undefined.
+             * Here we align the address by ignoring the lower bits. */
+            /* TODO: Test unaligned dump counter address on real hardware. */
+            s->statsaddr&= ~3;
+        }
          break;
      case CU_SHOWSTATS:
          /* Dump statistical counters. */
--
1.7.2.5




Reply via email to