On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> According to Intel's Open Source Software Developer Manual,
> the dump counters address must be Dword aligned.
> 
> The new code enforces this alignment, so s->statsaddr may now
> be used with stw_le_pci_dma() and stl_le_pci_dma().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de>

Anthiny, coul you apply pls?

> ---
>  hw/eepro100.c |   10 +++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/eepro100.c b/hw/eepro100.c
> index 7d59e71..29ec5b4 100644
> --- a/hw/eepro100.c
> +++ b/hw/eepro100.c
> @@ -976,7 +976,15 @@ static void eepro100_cu_command(EEPRO100State * s, 
> uint8_t val)
>      case CU_STATSADDR:
>          /* Load dump counters address. */
>          s->statsaddr = e100_read_reg4(s, SCBPointer);
> -        TRACE(OTHER, logout("val=0x%02x (status address)\n", val));
> +        TRACE(OTHER, logout("val=0x%02x (dump counters address)\n", val));
> +        if (s->statsaddr & 3) {
> +            /* Memory must be Dword aligned. */
> +            logout("unaligned dump counters address\n");
> +            /* Handling of misaligned addresses is undefined.
> +             * Here we align the address by ignoring the lower bits. */
> +            /* TODO: Test unaligned dump counter address on real hardware. */
> +            s->statsaddr &= ~3;
> +        }
>          break;
>      case CU_SHOWSTATS:
>          /* Dump statistical counters. */
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5

Reply via email to