Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:19:11AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/centos8.docker
>> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
>>  # THIS FILE WAS AUTO-GENERATED
>>  #
>> -#  $ lcitool dockerfile centos-8 qemu
>> +#  $ lcitool dockerfile centos-stream-8 qemu
>>  #
>>  # https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ci
>>
>> -FROM docker.io/library/centos:8
>> +FROM quay.io/centos/centos:stream8
> [...]
>> +++ b/tests/lcitool/refresh
>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ ubuntu2004_tsanhack = [
>>  ]
>>
>>  try:
>> -   generate_dockerfile("centos8", "centos-8")
>> +   generate_dockerfile("centos8", "centos-stream-8")
>
> I'm not convinced this is a good idea.
>
> CentOS 8 and CentOS Stream 8 are two pretty distinct operating
> systems in terms of update cadence and stability expectations, so I
> think that using the label "centos8" for containers and CI jobs that
> are actually consuming CentOS Stream 8 is going to be a source of
> confusion.
>
> I recommend proceeding with a thorough rename, after which the string
> "centos8" no longer shows up anywhere, instead.

Thomas do you agree? Should I drop the patch in favour or a new version
with a more extensive rename?

-- 
Alex Bennée

Reply via email to