On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:52:30PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > So printing it as %d is wrong. Notice that for the channel id, that > is an uint8_t, but I changed it anyways for consistency.
Just curious: uint_8 can always correctly converted to a int, so the patch shouldn't have a functional change, right? > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> -- Peter Xu
