On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 09:58, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 04:59:10PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 12/15/21 2:40 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org> > > > > > > Add two test cases for VIOT, one on the q35 machine and the other on > > > virt. To test complex topologies the q35 test has two PCIe buses that > > > bypass the IOMMU (and are therefore not described by VIOT), and two > > > buses that are translated by virtio-iommu. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org> > > > Message-id: 20211210170415.583179-7-jean-phili...@linaro.org > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) > > > > I should have been more careful while applying. The aarch64 host failure > > for this is not transient as I first assumed: > > > > PASS 5 qtest-aarch64/bios-tables-test /aarch64/acpi/virt/oem-fields > > qemu-system-aarch64: kvm_init_vcpu: kvm_arch_init_vcpu failed (0): Invalid > > argument > > Broken pipe > > ERROR qtest-aarch64/bios-tables-test - too few tests run (expected 6, got 5) > > make: *** [Makefile.mtest:312: run-test-37] Error 1 > > I'm guessing adding "tcg_only = true", like all other virt machine tests > in this file, should work around this, but I don't really understand the > problem because I can't reproduce it on my aarch64 host (I'm running > "configure --target-list=aarch64-softmmu" followed by "make -j10 > check-qtest V=1" in a loop)
What host are you testing on? The test case explicitly asks for "-cpu cortex-a57", so it is only going to work with KVM on hosts with a Cortex-A57. Richard: given I'm off work for Christmas now, if Jean-Philippe's suggested fix fixes this are you OK with just applying it directly to un-break the CI ? thanks -- PMM
