On 11/08/2011 12:26 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/06/2011 07:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > Perhaps the failure is only reproduced 80-90% of the time and this > > screws up the bisection. > > Correct, bad bisect. It actually reproduces reliably, when the bisecter > is reliable. > > The new candidate (disclaimer: unreliable bisecter) is: > > commit a5c57d64aa61b700db444c4864a1da11f1165db6 > Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > Date: Mon Sep 12 14:40:36 2011 +0200 > > qemu-timer: do not refer to runstate_is_running() > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > >
Fixed by 47113ab6b8c5659a, as Anthony pointed out on IRC. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
