On 11/06/2011 07:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Perhaps the failure is only reproduced 80-90% of the time and this
> screws up the bisection.
Correct, bad bisect. It actually reproduces reliably, when the bisecter
is reliable.
The new candidate (disclaimer: unreliable bisecter) is:
commit a5c57d64aa61b700db444c4864a1da11f1165db6
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Sep 12 14:40:36 2011 +0200
qemu-timer: do not refer to runstate_is_running()
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
