On 10/21/21 12:45 PM, matheus.fe...@eldorado.org.br wrote:
@@ -2075,7 +1969,7 @@ static void gen_xvxsigdp(DisasContext *ctx)
tcg_temp_free_i64(xbl);
}
-static bool do_lstxv(DisasContext *ctx, int ra, int displ,
+static bool do_lstxv(DisasContext *ctx, int ra, TCGv displ,
int rt, bool store)
{
TCGv ea;
@@ -2089,7 +1983,7 @@ static bool do_lstxv(DisasContext *ctx, int ra, int displ,
mop = DEF_MEMOP(MO_Q);
gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
- do_ea_calc(ctx, ra, tcg_const_tl(displ), ea);
+ do_ea_calc(ctx, ra, displ, ea);
if (ctx->le_mode) {
gen_addr_add(ctx, ea, ea, 8);
@@ -2127,11 +2021,26 @@ static bool do_lstxv_D(DisasContext *ctx, arg_D *a,
bool store)
REQUIRE_VECTOR(ctx);
}
- return do_lstxv(ctx, a->ra, a->si, a->rt, store);
+ return do_lstxv(ctx, a->ra, tcg_constant_tl(a->si), a->rt, store);
Ah, if these 3 lines had been in the previous patch, I wouldn't have been asking silly
questions. :-)
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
r~
