On 10/21/21 13:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 10/21/21 12:42, Peter Xu wrote:
>> The pci_bus_fn is similar to pci_bus_dev_fn that only takes a PCIBus* and an
>> opaque. The pci_bus_ret_fn is similar to pci_bus_fn but it allows to return
>> a
>> void* pointer.
>>
>> Use them where proper in pci.[ch], and to be used elsewhere.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/pci/pci.c | 6 ++----
>> include/hw/pci/pci.h | 12 +++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
>> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
>> @@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(PCIBus, PCIBusClass, PCI_BUS)
>> #define TYPE_PCIE_BUS "PCIE"
>>
>> typedef void (*pci_bus_dev_fn)(PCIBus *b, PCIDevice *d, void *opaque);
>> +typedef void (*pci_bus_fn)(PCIBus *b, void *opaque);
>> +typedef void* (*pci_bus_ret_fn)(PCIBus *b, void *opaque);
Now looking at patch #8, I wonder if it wouldn't be cleaner to have
a single:
/*
* pci_bus_fn:
* @bus: PCI bus
* @opaque: Pointer to opaque pointer,
can be used as input *and* output
* Return #true on success, #false on failure
*/
typedef bool (*pci_bus_fn)(PCIBus *bus, void **opaque);
