Am 25.10.2011 17:50, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/target-m68k/machine.c b/target-m68k/machine.c
>>> index e69de29..86b6fe9 100644
>>> --- a/target-m68k/machine.c
>>> +++ b/target-m68k/machine.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>>> +
>>> +#include "hw/hw.h"
>>> +
>>> +/* To make this architecture migratable, we need to define cpu state
>>> + here. Other things need to be done elsewhere */
>>> +
>>> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu = {
>>> + .name = "cpu",
>>> + .unmigratable = 1,
>>> +};
>>
>> Here ...
>>
>>> diff --git a/target-sh4/machine.c b/target-sh4/machine.c
>>> index e69de29..86b6fe9 100644
>>> --- a/target-sh4/machine.c
>>> +++ b/target-sh4/machine.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>>> +
>>> +#include "hw/hw.h"
>>> +
>>> +/* To make this architecture migratable, we need to define cpu state
>>> + here. Other things need to be done elsewhere */
>>> +
>>> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu = {
>>> + .name = "cpu",
>>> + .unmigratable = 1,
>>> +};
>>
>> ... and here you sort-of create new files (empty before) without a
>> license header. The contents is trivial right now, but it would get a
>> case for the Wiki trying to figure out what license to put on other
>> people's code.
>
> None of target-*/machine.c files have a license line. I can put the
> normal boilerplate on them, but I have just transformed them, So .. who
> should I put as copyright owner? Puting me is (at least) a bit
> presumptuous, if not just plain false O:-)
Note my comment was specific to those that you did not really transform.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
