Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 25.10.2011 16:00, schrieb Juan Quintela:
>> This makes several changes:
>> - exports VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu non-static.
>> - makes sure that every cpu has a vmstate_cpu or cpu_save/load defined
>> - for the architecture that had nothing, it just register the cpu as
>> unmigratable.
>> - Depending on CPU_SAVE_VERSION we register old/new migration style
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
>
> I like that move in general.
>
>> diff --git a/target-m68k/machine.c b/target-m68k/machine.c
>> index e69de29..86b6fe9 100644
>> --- a/target-m68k/machine.c
>> +++ b/target-m68k/machine.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +
>> +#include "hw/hw.h"
>> +
>> +/* To make this architecture migratable, we need to define cpu state
>> + here. Other things need to be done elsewhere */
>> +
>> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu = {
>> + .name = "cpu",
>> + .unmigratable = 1,
>> +};
>
> Here ...
>
>> diff --git a/target-sh4/machine.c b/target-sh4/machine.c
>> index e69de29..86b6fe9 100644
>> --- a/target-sh4/machine.c
>> +++ b/target-sh4/machine.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +
>> +#include "hw/hw.h"
>> +
>> +/* To make this architecture migratable, we need to define cpu state
>> + here. Other things need to be done elsewhere */
>> +
>> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_cpu = {
>> + .name = "cpu",
>> + .unmigratable = 1,
>> +};
>
> ... and here you sort-of create new files (empty before) without a
> license header. The contents is trivial right now, but it would get a
> case for the Wiki trying to figure out what license to put on other
> people's code.
None of target-*/machine.c files have a license line. I can put the
normal boilerplate on them, but I have just transformed them, So .. who
should I put as copyright owner? Puting me is (at least) a bit
presumptuous, if not just plain false O:-)
Later, Juan.
