On 9/2/21 11:55 PM, Peter Xu wrote: > Hi, Phil, > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 08:26:04AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> address-space shared 4 times: > > I commented on the format of the output, I saw that it's switched back to the > v1. Any reason?
The code uses the format you asked, I simply forgot to update the commit description :/ Sorry, I'll respin. > > Although I still think what I proposed looks better, I don't have a strong > "no" > to this either. Just want to know the motivations. > > E.g., for a script parsing this output, it can easily skip and identify > duplications when scanned "address-space:" following another "address-space:". > Now it needs to understand two layouts, and that "N times" looks superfluous.
