Hi, Phil, On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 08:26:04AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > address-space shared 4 times:
I commented on the format of the output, I saw that it's switched back to the v1. Any reason? Although I still think what I proposed looks better, I don't have a strong "no" to this either. Just want to know the motivations. E.g., for a script parsing this output, it can easily skip and identify duplications when scanned "address-space:" following another "address-space:". Now it needs to understand two layouts, and that "N times" looks superfluous. > - bcm2835-dma-memory > - bcm2835-fb-memory > - bcm2835-property-memory > - dwc2 > 0000000000000000-00000000ffffffff (prio 0, i/o): bcm2835-gpu > 0000000000000000-000000003fffffff (prio 0, ram): alias > bcm2835-gpu-ram-alias[*] @ram 0000000000000000-000000003fffffff > 0000000040000000-000000007fffffff (prio 0, ram): alias > bcm2835-gpu-ram-alias[*] @ram 0000000000000000-000000003fffffff > 000000007e000000-000000007effffff (prio 1, i/o): alias > bcm2835-peripherals @bcm2835-peripherals 0000000000000000-0000000000ffffff > 0000000080000000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, ram): alias > bcm2835-gpu-ram-alias[*] @ram 0000000000000000-000000003fffffff > 00000000c0000000-00000000ffffffff (prio 0, ram): alias > bcm2835-gpu-ram-alias[*] @ram 0000000000000000-000000003fffffff > > address-space: bcm2835-mbox-memory > 0000000000000000-000000000000008f (prio 0, i/o): bcm2835-mbox > 0000000000000010-000000000000001f (prio 0, i/o): bcm2835-fb > 0000000000000080-000000000000008f (prio 0, i/o): bcm2835-property -- Peter Xu
