On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 18:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7/23/21 7:03 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > I realised I'm on holiday next week so I thought I'd better send this now. > > > > The following changes since commit a146af86c8247f41b641783428b95ee71eb0e43f: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch > > 'remotes/kraxel/tags/vga-20210723-pull-request' into staging (2021-07-23 > > 12:16:12 +0100) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://github.com/stsquad/qemu.git tags/pull-for-6.1-rc1-230721-1 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 0a9487d80af9ed6fa14d2696bc34a920b32e53e5: > > > > gitlab-ci: Extract OpenSBI job rules to reusable section (2021-07-23 > > 17:22:16 +0100) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Doc, metadata, plugin and testing updates for 6.1-rc1: > > > > - git ignore some file editor detritus > > - add overview on device emulation terminology > > - remove needless if leg in configure custom devices logic > > - numerous gitdm/mailmap updates > > - fix plugin_exit race for linux-user > > - fix a few bugs in cache modelling plugin > > - fix plugin calculation of physical address > > - handle pure assembler/linker tcg tests outside of docker > > - add tricore build to gitlab > > - remove superfluous MacOSX task > > - generalise the OpenBSI gitlab rules > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1): > > gitlab-ci: Extract OpenSBI job rules to reusable section > > Oops this isn't to latest version of this patch :/ > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-07/msg06130.html
Given Alex is on holiday, should I apply this pullreq anyway and then you could send a patch to fix up the differences afterwards, or should we drop the pullreq (and maybe this stuff doesn't go in for rc1)? -- PMM
