From: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mando...@gmail.com>

It's not necessary to lock the address translation portion of the
vcpu_mem_access callback.

Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mando...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210714172151.8494-3-ma.mando...@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20210720232703.10650-23-alex.ben...@linaro.org>

diff --git a/contrib/plugins/cache.c b/contrib/plugins/cache.c
index 4a71602639..695fb969dc 100644
--- a/contrib/plugins/cache.c
+++ b/contrib/plugins/cache.c
@@ -355,15 +355,14 @@ static void vcpu_mem_access(unsigned int vcpu_index, 
qemu_plugin_meminfo_t info,
     struct qemu_plugin_hwaddr *hwaddr;
     InsnData *insn;
 
-    g_mutex_lock(&mtx);
     hwaddr = qemu_plugin_get_hwaddr(info, vaddr);
     if (hwaddr && qemu_plugin_hwaddr_is_io(hwaddr)) {
-        g_mutex_unlock(&mtx);
         return;
     }
 
     effective_addr = hwaddr ? qemu_plugin_hwaddr_phys_addr(hwaddr) : vaddr;
 
+    g_mutex_lock(&mtx);
     if (!access_cache(dcache, effective_addr)) {
         insn = (InsnData *) userdata;
         insn->dmisses++;
-- 
2.20.1


Reply via email to