On 10/14/2011 04:02 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> It would still host the checks on BDRV_O_NO_FLUSH and bs->drv->*_flush.
> It would be the same as bdrv_flush_co_entry is now, minus the
> marshalling in/out of the RwCo.
Right.
By the way, I like how you handle all three backends in the same
function. I think this is a lot more readable than the solution used by
read/write (changing the function pointers on driver registration).
Yeah, and it makes sense to handle all of them in the bdrv_co_* version.
Will resubmit.
Paolo
