Am 14.10.2011 10:41, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Add coroutine support for flush and apply the same emulation that > we already do for read/write. bdrv_aio_flush is simplified to always > go through a coroutine. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
To make the implementation more consistent with read/write operations, wouldn't it make sense to provide a bdrv_co_flush() globally instead of using the synchronous version as the preferred public interface? This is the semantics that I would expect of a bdrv_co_flush() anyway, your use of it for an AIO emulation functions confused me a bit at first. Kevin
