On 6/23/21 8:16 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Nevertheless, I'm reluctant to add more differeneces. That's not a "no". It's a "you need to make a compelling case".
I'm not sure it's my case to make; I believe you are the authority in this matter so the work should be defined in terms of what you are prepared to accept.
I'm not sure there's a better argument for &error_ignore beyond "It's easy to audit", but I find that to be a compelling one especially where new contributors are concerned.
If we still wanted to move back to glib (which seems unlikely) replacing &error_ignore by NULL seems like a trivial thing to do. Your call.
--js
