On 6/17/21 11:33 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:21:45PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 6/16/21 9:12 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 6/16/21 9:22 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Introduce the qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint() helper
>>>> to avoid accessing QCryptoTLSCreds internal 'endpoint' field
>>>> directly.
>>>
>>> I don't understand this one. Comment ...
>>>
>>>> +bool qcrypto_tls_session_check_role(QCryptoTLSCreds *creds,
>>>> + QCryptoTLSCredsEndpoint endpoint,
>>>> + Error **errp)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint(creds, endpoint, errp);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> ... doesn't match the function.
>>>
>>> The new function is a pure forwarder, and begs the question of why the
>>> caller isn't using qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint directly.
>>
>> I tried to follow the maintainer/subsystem style (I was also tempted to
>> use qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint directly). ui/vnc uses the TLS
>> "session" API and not the "creds" one. Daniel, what is your preference?
>
> I think we don't need this extra function - just use the function from
> earlier directly.
Great, simpler :)
