On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:21:45PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/16/21 9:12 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 6/16/21 9:22 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Introduce the qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint() helper
> >> to avoid accessing QCryptoTLSCreds internal 'endpoint' field
> >> directly.
> >
> > I don't understand this one. Comment ...
> >
> >> +bool qcrypto_tls_session_check_role(QCryptoTLSCreds *creds,
> >> + QCryptoTLSCredsEndpoint endpoint,
> >> + Error **errp)
> >> +{
> >> + return qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint(creds, endpoint, errp);
> >> +}
> >
> > ... doesn't match the function.
> >
> > The new function is a pure forwarder, and begs the question of why the
> > caller isn't using qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint directly.
>
> I tried to follow the maintainer/subsystem style (I was also tempted to
> use qcrypto_tls_creds_check_endpoint directly). ui/vnc uses the TLS
> "session" API and not the "creds" one. Daniel, what is your preference?
I think we don't need this extra function - just use the function from
earlier directly.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
