On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 03:56:46PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 6/15/21 4:08 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:32:11PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > > In general, what's the convention when a bug is independent of (say) > > the accel: does it get none of the accel tags, or all of them? > > Likewise with OS and the other categories. > > None: remove the label. Otherwise you'll notify everybody subscribed > to specific labels. > > >> We probably want to keep a set of labels that apply to the host > >> architecture. These are useful for build failures, environment setup > >> issues, > >> or just documenting the exact environment on which an issue was observed. > > > > Ah.. that's another general question. Are the labels supposed to > > document where the problem has been definitely observed, or a best > > estimate at where it will appear. It would be very common for a bug > > to be observed initially on only one, but quickly turn out to be > > independent of host and/or target arch. > > Similar. If the problem is generic, remove the specific labels. > > Regards, > > Phil.
Understood, thanks.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
