Am 14.06.21 um 19:32 schrieb John Snow:
RTH raises the issue of the "TCI" subsystem of TCG, which is not a
full accelerator in its own right, but (I think) a special case of
TCG. If I keep the 1:1 mapping to ACCEL_CLASS_NAME, "accel: TCI" is
inappropriate.
Some suggestions:
- "TCI" by itself, simple enough.
- "TCG-TCI" or "TCG: TCI" or "TCG/TCI" or similar, so that it shows up
in label search when you search for 'tcg'.
- "accel: TCG:TCI". Similar to above but uses the "accel:" prefix too.
My only concern here is completeness of the label: this one seems like
it's at particular risk of being forgotten or lost. It works perfectly
well as an organizational bucket for people working on TCI, but I
wonder if it will work well as an "issue inbox". Intended use begins
to matter here. Your thoughts, Stefan?
I appreciate your, Richard's and all other efforts to further improve
the label system.
Regarding the label for TCI I have no special personal preferences. The
above suggestions are all fine for me, so choose one which fits best to
other labels.
Thanks,
Stefan
