Meson is more verbose than the configure script; the outcome of the preadv test
can be found in its output and it is not worth including it again in the
summary.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
meson.build | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 5fdb757751..38f6f193f5 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2657,7 +2657,6 @@ summary_info += {'PIE': get_option('b_pie')}
summary_info += {'static build': config_host.has_key('CONFIG_STATIC')}
summary_info += {'malloc trim support': has_malloc_trim}
summary_info += {'membarrier': config_host.has_key('CONFIG_MEMBARRIER')}
-summary_info += {'preadv support': config_host_data.get('CONFIG_PREADV')}
summary_info += {'fdatasync': config_host.has_key('CONFIG_FDATASYNC')}
summary_info += {'madvise': config_host.has_key('CONFIG_MADVISE')}
summary_info += {'posix_madvise':
config_host.has_key('CONFIG_POSIX_MADVISE')}
--
2.31.1
