Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 21/05/2021 14.28, Willian Rampazzo wrote: >> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:16 AM Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > [...] >>> Alternatively, what about renaming the "acceptance" tests to "validation" >>> instead? That word does not have a duplicated definition in the context of >>> QEMU yet, so I think it would be less confusing. >> While at the beginning of your reply, I started thinking if >> "validation" would cause less confusion for the QEMU project. Although >> validation testing is a broader concept inside the Verification & >> Validation process, encompassing unit testing, functional testing, >> integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing, it may be >> an option for the QEMU project. >> While system testing would be the correct terminology to use, if it >> causes more confusion, using a less strict terminology, like >> validation testing, is valid, in my opinion. > > <semi-homorous-friday-bikeshedding> > Or we could come up with a new, artificial name instead (like > "qtests"). It certainly need a "q" in the name. For example what > about: > > - avoqado > - valiqation > - aqueptance > - inteqration make check-quixotic? > > ? > </semi-homorous-friday-bikeshedding> > > Thomas -- Alex Bennée
