On 5/21/21 2:42 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 21/05/2021 14.28, Willian Rampazzo wrote: >> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:16 AM Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > [...] >>> Alternatively, what about renaming the "acceptance" tests to >>> "validation" >>> instead? That word does not have a duplicated definition in the >>> context of >>> QEMU yet, so I think it would be less confusing. >> >> While at the beginning of your reply, I started thinking if >> "validation" would cause less confusion for the QEMU project. Although >> validation testing is a broader concept inside the Verification & >> Validation process, encompassing unit testing, functional testing, >> integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing, it may be >> an option for the QEMU project. >> >> While system testing would be the correct terminology to use, if it >> causes more confusion, using a less strict terminology, like >> validation testing, is valid, in my opinion. > > <semi-homorous-friday-bikeshedding> > Or we could come up with a new, artificial name instead (like "qtests"). > It certainly need a "q" in the name. For example what about: > > - avoqado
+1 for 'make check-avoqado' :)
