On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 11:22, Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> Message-id:
> fcc125d96da941b56c817c9dd6068dc36478fc53.1619234854.git.alistair.fran...@wdc.com
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 10 ----------
> target/riscv/csr.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> target/riscv/translate.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
> index 26eccc5eb1..a596f80f20 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/translate.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,17 @@ static inline bool has_ext(DisasContext *ctx, uint32_t ext)
> return ctx->misa & ext;
> }
>
> +#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
> +# define is_32bit(ctx) true
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> +# define is_32bit(ctx) false
> +#else
> +static inline bool is_32bit(DisasContext *ctx)
> +{
> + return (ctx->misa & RV32) == RV32;
> +}
> +#endif
Hi; Coverity points out (CID 1453107) that this is_32bit() function
can never return true for at least some build configs, because RV32
is defined as ((target_ulong)1 << (TARGET_LONG_BITS - 2))
but ctx->misa is a uint32_t field, which (if TARGET_LONG_BITS is
64) is not big enough for the RV32 bit.
Bug, or false positive ?
thanks
-- PMM
